Re: bash package removing /bin/sh on upgrade

[Raul Miller <raul@usatoday.com>]

On Mon, Oct 04, 1999 at 01:58:07PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> One benefit always moving it has, is that it tests all code paths on upgrade
> (including the "add a /bin/sh symlink") which makes it more likely to catch
> any bugs while we're still working on potato.
> 
> I don't see how this makes --rename a `Very Bad Thing', though.

I don't see that there's ever a need for /bin/sh to not exist.

And, since we can't control the environment, I think it always
should exist.

-- 
Raul