Re: slink is gone, goals for potato?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Mon, 1 Mar 1999, Michael Stone wrote:
> Where have you heard this? It's come up on the list more than once, and
> each time it was explained. And if you check the source
> (ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/glibc/glibc-2.1-README) you'll find reference
> to political, not copyright, problems. (I.e., some gnu people don't like
> promoting egcs instead of the GNU cc)
I really *really* don't have time to follow all the threads, so you'll
have to forgive me missing that. Like I said, the last I heard of it was
licensing issues. And quite frankly, personally, I don't want to see egcs
as the requirement till egcs gets a lot better. IMHO, quite frankly, egcs
has a LOT of room for improvement on *every* architecture.
Anyways, it's not surprising to me. It's not logical to promote someone
else's product over your own. You won't hear an AT&T employee telling you
to go with MCI. ;P
- -prj
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBNttZw8ES8LwwGtVlAQEfHgQAkEkDJ2PgYCRLRRdXi5pkc9HAsAFslG8r
WQaz/Ux0iwZuJ4xwQTpQ5Z00f18aw8OjEOvmY6nK7z1v/aSCPmq3XW6svKMY5VHZ
ixf1QtN6Uv4GS/vB35PXQ5t5dQ+aPJATSnGg0mn9lYGiHorvn+BDn56mbx3u037w
XA6kVqHVGM0=
=CLe9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: