Re: New draft of jcode.pl licence
I'll move to -devel lists from -legal, because legal issues are already solved.
At Wed, 15 Dec 1999 10:41:31 -0800 (PST),
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <email@example.com> wrote:
> > I'd like to upgrade jcode.pl in fml, requesting to upstream author of fml
> > and closes Bug#52108 (and maybe Bug#52109, both are release critical).
> > Is there any problem?
> there are 3 copies of jcode.pl in Debian, one in fml, one in another package,
> and finally and actual libjcode-perl package.
> Could the three of you get together and work out one package which
> contains the file.
Hmm, so should i package these as follows?
- main/interpreters/libjcode-perl (provides jcode.pl)
- main/mail/fml depends libjcode-perl
- main/web/hns2 depends libjcode-perl
and modify fml and hns2 to use jcode.pl in libjcode-perl instead
of thier own jcode.pl. Is this ok?