Re: Binary only Recompilations
On Sat, Dec 11, 1999 at 04:56:14PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 11, 1999 at 02:43:22PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > The build-version is the current date in UTC in general. This prevents
> > the need for finding some way to get a new versionnumber.
> This still leaves us with the problem that we can't see which Source Version
> was used. The version number of the binary does not need to be the same as
> the source version, as the bash/libreadline example showed (IIRC).
This already happens. libreadline now has its own source package, but
Maintainer: Masato Taruishi <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Source: alsadriver (0.4.1e-7)
Note the version number on the Source field. It's generated automatically.