Re: mutt
On Fri, Dec 10, 1999 at 11:58:49AM -0800, Nick Moffitt wrote:
|Quoting Gregory T. Norris:
|> Have you looked at jpico (package joe)? It seems to do a pretty
|> decent job of impersonating pico... mind you, it's been a few years
|> since I've used pine/pico on a regular basis.
|
| Wonderful! Thank you! I've switched /etc/alternatives/editor
|to it!
|
|--
|CrackMonkey.Org - Non-sequitur arguments and ad-hominem personal attacks
I found in /usr/share/doc/mutt some example, making mutt behave more or less like pine. There are some problems, for example I had to
set
bind index r group-reply
bind pager r group-reply
in this example to be able to post to this mail-list.
I feel now nearly as well with mutt, as with pine.
But my editor is still pico. I don't think joe or jpico is close to pico.
--JS
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: mutt
- From: Nick Moffitt <nick@zork.net>
- Re: mutt
- From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
- References:
- Re: mutt
- From: Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>
- Re: mutt
- From: Nick Moffitt <nick@zork.net>
- Re: mutt
- From: "Gregory T. Norris" <haphazard@socket.net>
- Re: mutt
- From: Nick Moffitt <nick@zork.net>