Re: experimental bash-2.03 and readline-4.0 packages for potato
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: experimental bash-2.03 and readline-4.0 packages for potato
- From: Joel Klecker <jk@espy.org>
- Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 11:35:00 -0800
- Message-id: <v0422080ab45df81d5481@[206.163.71.146]>
- In-reply-to: <19991121134830.A5501@wormhole.galaxy>
- References: <14390.59664.608799.903907@bolero> <v04220804b45cc5012c8c@[206.163.71.146]> <19991121134830.A5501@wormhole.galaxy>
At 13:48 +0100 1999-11-21, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
>Sure it is. I did the upload and this bug is already in the BTS. There
>are also some approaches to solve this in the bug logs. I don't think
>we should have the /bin/sh link in the package again. There must be
>another way letting the local admin change the /bin/sh link.
dpkg-divert, it's there, it works, it's safe. I don't see why the bash
maintainer scripts need to be made more complex for the sole benefit of the
few people who use something other than bash as /bin/sh, when those folks
don't really need the additional complexity either.
--
Joel Klecker (aka Espy) Debian GNU/Linux Developer
<URL:mailto:jk@espy.org> <URL:mailto:espy@debian.org>
<URL:http://web.espy.org/> <URL:http://www.debian.org/>
Reply to: