Re: experimental bash-2.03 and readline-4.0 packages for potato
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: experimental bash-2.03 and readline-4.0 packages for potato
- From: Joel Klecker <jk@espy.org>
- Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 11:31:59 -0800
- Message-id: <v04220808b45df641e4aa@[206.163.71.146]>
- In-reply-to: <14391.57807.834574.240343@bolero>
- References: <14390.59664.608799.903907@bolero> <v04220804b45cc5012c8c@[206.163.71.146]> <14391.57807.834574.240343@bolero>
At 13:22 +0100 1999-11-21, Matthias Klose wrote:
>What about the possibility that /bin/sh becomes an alternative, which
>is provided by bash? Of course bash's postinst has to use /bin/bash.
>But does bash's postinst runs before any other configure scripts run?
No, alternatives pose the same problem, if people want to use a different
shell as /bin/sh they can use diversions on the symlink. Diversions are
safe because dpkg knows about them.
> > It was expected that potato would get libreadline4, after which bash could
> > be dynamically linked with readline again.
>
>"it was expected": you don't expect it anymore?
Not after we'd nearly hit freeze without it.
>Who decides? Currently I do have apackage, which fixes more than
>critical and important bugs. Should it be uploaded, when all critical
>bugs are resolved? Even if it's a new upstream version?
I think it should be uploaded.
--
Joel Klecker (aka Espy) Debian GNU/Linux Developer
<URL:mailto:jk@espy.org> <URL:mailto:espy@debian.org>
<URL:http://web.espy.org/> <URL:http://www.debian.org/>
Reply to: