[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: qmail should use different uids



On Fri, Nov 19, 1999 at 02:01:09AM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> The advantage is simple: if we get all references to non-free removed
> from main the FSF will distribute Debian as well. Having the qmail uids
> in the default passwd would clearly be unacceptable for them.

If having userid's in /etc/passwd that are used by non-free software is
grounds for RMS saying that Debian isn't completely free, RMS can shove it
IM(NSH)O.  I think qmail-src should be patched to allocate userids if they
haven't been on its installation.  But I don't think we should break
compatibility with the current packages to do it.

If we can do it without breaking installed packages or installed systems,
I'm all for it.  Not because qmail is non-free, not because RMS says so,
but rather because that 1-100 range is very small and has an important
purpose.  I don't see how you're going to be able to cleanly move to new
userids now though.

-- 
- Joseph Carter         GnuPG public key:   1024D/DCF9DAB3, 2048g/3F9C2A43
- knghtbrd@debian.org   20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC  44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
<Knghtbrd> you people are all insane.
<Joey> knight: sure, that's why we work on Debian.
<JHM> Knghtbrd: get in touch with your inner nutcase.

Attachment: pgplJA4Ykoi9a.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: