Re: cdecl/c++decl: different version?
On Wed, Nov 17, 1999 at 12:07:19AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 1999 at 01:35:40PM +0100, Christian Surchi wrote:
> > I have a cdecl 2.5 by David Conrad, for c and c++:
>
> [...]
> > I think that a package for the first one is bad. Could be incorporated in
> > cutils?
> >
> > cdecl 2.5 is GPL and I found it in freshmeat. It should be also in devel/lang/c
>
> It is a bit messy to merge sources like this. However, the cdecl you
> refer to is quite a lot better than the one in cutils. I suggest that
> you package it separately and divert cutils' cdecl, or we use alternatives
> for it.
I have already made a package called "cdecl" (surprise...) with David
Conrads version, this package diverts from cutils.
--
Fredrik Hallenberg hallon@lysator.liu.se
http://www.lysator.liu.se/~hallon hallon@debian.org
Reply to: