Re: cdecl/c++decl: different version?
On Tue, Nov 16, 1999 at 01:35:40PM +0100, Christian Surchi wrote:
> I have a cdecl 2.5 by David Conrad, for c and c++:
[...]
> I think that a package for the first one is bad. Could be incorporated in
> cutils?
>
> cdecl 2.5 is GPL and I found it in freshmeat. It should be also in devel/lang/c
It is a bit messy to merge sources like this. However, the cdecl you
refer to is quite a lot better than the one in cutils. I suggest that
you package it separately and divert cutils' cdecl, or we use alternatives
for it.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB. CCs of replies on mailing lists are welcome.
Reply to: