Re: ITP: Debian History
On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 10:41:25AM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 11, 1999 at 01:33:04PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > > On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote:
> > > exim has priority: important. The others have priority: extra.
> > > Does this mean exim is "the only proper(tm)"? No.
> > >
> > > Why would you call apache (or whatever httpd is chosen) "the only proper"
> > > if it is made the only optional one, then?
> > by default we use [ exim ] MTA
> > by default we use [ NO ] httpd
> > feel the difference ?
> Yes: There are more reasons to call exim "the only proper MTA" than
> reasons to call apache or whatever "the only proper httpd". However, I
> have not heard of a great complain about exim being "the only proper MTA".
> Where is the problem?
I do not complain.
MTA Imp Xtr \
httpd Opt Opt | are ok
ftpd Opt Opt /
httpd Opt Xtr \ are not ok
ftpd Opt Xtr / cause Opt soft should be never the only proper(tm)