Re: ITP: Debian History
On Tue, Nov 09, 1999 at 04:06:36PM -0500, Clint Adams wrote:
> > and the only doc that should go to extra is doc describing extra package
> > (this is what we have now really. dont change it)
>
> Not true.
Do you see any other (section:doc,priority:extra) ?
I dont
> I might agree that there are packages in extra that don't belong in extra,
> and that there are packages outside of extra that should be in extra.
maybe someone will find better wording for priority-definitions ?
> Do you expect the average user to reasonably want
> to install a document about Debian's history?
Yes, I do.
There are a lot of people around which dont know much about
Unix/Gnu/Linux/Debian history and would love to gain a litte
knowledge about this. I hope our history will be interesting
for them. If not, there should be a few words in description
that this is `not for the rest of us' and we shouldnt make
package extra
Reply to: