Re: ITP: pine (?)

To: Piotr Roszatycki <dexter@fnet.pl>
Cc: Debian Development Mailing List <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: ITP: pine (?)
From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 11:52:30 +0100 (CET)
Message-id: <Pine.LNX.3.96.991102115012.21293A-100000@cantor.unex.es>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9911011838340.13335-100000@cyan.fnet.pl>

On Mon, 1 Nov 1999, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:

> It looks like the last licence of pine allows to redistribute
> binaries.

It looks not. No paragraph allow modified binaries to be distributed.

If we disagree, please let us discuss in debian-legal, an "ITP" is not
a good way to resolve this.

Thanks.

-- 
 "37adb109f8551bdc52a8d7402536f589" (a truly random sig)

Reply to:

References:
- ITP: pine (?)
  - From: Piotr Roszatycki <dexter@fnet.pl>

Prev by Date: Re: mkdir bug?
Next by Date: Re: mkdir bug?
Previous by thread: Re: ITP: pine (?)
Next by thread: Re: ITP: pine (?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread