[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] latest ash has broken 'echo' command



On Thu, Oct 21, 1999 at 11:13:24PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> It's not broken.  The Single Unix Specification says that echo must not
> support any options.

Then the Single Unix Specification is broken, and we shouldn't follow
it. Seriously, -e and -n are expected features of echo on GNU/Linux
systems, no matter what the Single Unix Spec might or might not say.

Dropping them shortly before freeze seems an insane thing to do too,
fwiw.

Are the BSD people distributing ash without echo -e/-n?

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. PGP encrypted mail preferred.

 ``The thing is: trying to be too generic is EVIL. It's stupid, it 
        results in slower code, and it results in more bugs.''
                                        -- Linus Torvalds

Attachment: pgpfsaLGCaQfn.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: