[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Poor failure recovery

On Tue, Oct 19, 1999 at 01:09:27PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> Excellent, so if there is a statically-linked sash, this cuts down on
> things.

sash (stand alone shell) is statically linked.  There is no dynamically linked
sash package.

> > It might be nice to have a statically linked fsck.
> Imperitive.

Also note that fsck is more than one executable (ls /sbin/fsck*).

> > Is there any particular advantage to having a statically linked
> > cat?  [Are you wanting to run shell scripts on a heavily damaged
> > system?]
> You need something to view files.  Maybe "more".

sash has a -more builtin.


Reply to: