NMU for sitecopy ok ?
I noticed a recent bugreport about the sitecopy version being ancient.
The package in unstable is 0.4.8, while upstream is at 0.8.2.
In fact there are four bug reports on sitecopy in the BTS; three of them
complain about the ancient version (175 and 77 days old). There was no
reaction by the maintainer nor did he merge the similar reports.
In this case, is it ok to make an NMU of sitecopy ? The problem is that
the package now includes a Gnome version, therefore it should be split
in two packages I guess.