Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality
- From: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
- Date: Sat, 9 Oct 1999 18:49:40 -0700
- Message-id: <[🔎] 19991009184940.F17622@kitenet.net>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <19990929215753.A18367@empire.anu.edu.au>
- References: <008c01bf069f$5a931aa0$1701a8c0@datacoresoftware.com> <19990924233428.O9912@gerf.gerf.org> <19990925011111.B17910@usatoday.com> <19990927130557.A8109@taz.net.au> <19990927032154.A30222@usatoday.com> <19990929065601.B25093@taz.net.au> <xe13dvyqpyj.fsf@paycheck.thok.org> <19990929155137.E30440@taz.net.au> <19990929043104.C13763@shot.org> <19990929215753.A18367@empire.anu.edu.au>
Drake Diedrich wrote:
> One way to minimize the harm of unintentionally installed or
> misconfigured daemons would be to add a default ipchain/ipfwadm policy
> rejecting all TCP SYN (incoming initialization) and non-DNS UDP packets
> except those from localhost.
Good lord.
Does anyone else feel people on the net are too paraniod these days?
--
see shy jo
Reply to: