[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#45307: [PROPOSAL] virtual package ident-server

> This is unnecessary unless something actually is going to depend on it.  None
> of these packages overlap in their fs name space.  The only thing they have
> in common is the inetd.conf entry.  This is easily managed with update-inetd,
> just like finger and others.

How are multiple identd packages going to know which one belongs in
inetd.conf without the use of alternatives?

Reply to: