Re: I'd like to coordinate a major update of stable
Oscar Levi wrote:
> Let me be a critic. Given the vacuum of release goals, there is no
> need to criticise Debian for long release cycles. On the other hand,
> making changes to a stable (tested) release is another matter. What
> is the plan for guaranteeing that updates to slink don't break it? I
> can see this working if we open a second unstable branch, slink-prime.
> In that case, let's call a duck, a duck. Is this a proposal to start
> another release candidate?
We're going to use already-tested packages, and also freeze it for a month.
--
see shy jo
Reply to: