Re: rc?.d policy?
> But if a user removes the S99xdm link in rc2.d then the next time xdm is
> upgraded it will be added again. This issue of the package managment
> tools over writing what the system administrator sets has been debated
> before, in favor of the system administrator(Recall the /usr/doc/*.gz
> issue recently on -devel). This is what I was describing. Mike, or
> anyone else, can you clarify why Debian does not have a destinction
> between user runlevels for things like networking, X, etc?
Because no-one's written any (accepted) policy proposals to do this.
Julian
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://www.debian.org/~jdg
Reply to: