[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Potato, Kernel 2.2 -> 2.4



I heard that they were expecting the 2.4 kernel by this Xmas, but I honestly
don't think it will be ready that quickly.

							Dave Bristel


On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Peter Allen wrote:

> Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 18:53:32 +0100
> From: Peter Allen <P.Allen@pallen.dabsol.co.uk>
> To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Potato, Kernel 2.2 -> 2.4
> Resent-Date: 3 Aug 1999 18:05:19 -0000
> Resent-From: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
> 
> I thought that 2.4 was not due to be released for another 
> year and a half or so, in which case the post potato distribution
> can be timed to be released on that.  (With a safe gap for
> big bugs to be corrected.)
> 
> 			Peter Allen
> 
> Kenneth Scharf wrote:
> > 
> > I know I'm risking being flamed with this, so let me first say that I
> > know that Debian does a very good job at putting out the highest
> > quality linux distro there is (that's why I use it).  From my reading
> > of the Linux news sites, it appears quite likely that by the time
> > Potato is released (or very shortly after) the 2.4 series kernel will
> > be out, and debian will be behind the power curve again, with all the
> > other distros out with a 2.4 version.
> > 
> > Is there anyway to put out a kernel upgrade package which contains ONLY
> > the packages needed to upgrade to a new kernel (IE: everything that the
> > new kernel 'breaks') plus the needed build and configure scripts.  This
> > would not be a complete distro, just a 'system' upgrade.
> > 
> > I have wanted to try the 2.2 series myself (I won't until the official
> > 2.2.11 comes out with the file corruption fix finally in).  I am afread
> > to do this on top of slink because I don't want to break anything.
> > There have been some HowTo's on what the 2.2 series changes over the
> > 2.0 series, but I would feel better with an offical Debian approved
> > kernel upgrade method.  In light of the proposed rapid development of
> > the 2.3-2.4 series kernel such an upgrade should be kept on the back
> > burner for potato (to avoid the snickers from the RedHat/SuSe/Caldera
> > crowd.)
> > 
> > Ok my two cents worth.  Keep up the good work.
> > 
> > ===
> > Amateur Radio, when all else fails!
> > 
> > http://www.qsl.net/wa2mze
> > 
> > Debian Gnu Linux, Live Free or .....
> 
> I
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 


Reply to: