[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ash vs. bash



On Sat, Jul 24, 1999 at 05:28:59PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Sun, 25 Jul 1999 02:19:59 +0200, Fabien Tassin wrote:
> 
> >that no stand alone sh are available. This brings us to the inital subject...
> >we can't switch from bash to ash/ksh/zsh/etc without breaking everyting :(
> 
>     Yes, we can.  As people have pointed out they have switched to ash and
> their systems are running perfectly fine.  So, obviously, "everything" is
> *NOT* broken.

What if I have scripts on my machine that I wrote myself that use bashisms and
#!/bin/sh ? (Not that I do :)

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sarel Botha          |     Computer &           | +27 341 81341
(sjb@dundee.lia.net) |        Accounting        | BOX 2065, Dundee
                     |           Services       | 3000, South Africa
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Reply to: