Re: ash vs. bash
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 25 Jul 1999 02:19:59 +0200, Fabien Tassin wrote:
>that no stand alone sh are available. This brings us to the inital subject...
>we can't switch from bash to ash/ksh/zsh/etc without breaking everyting :(
Yes, we can. As people have pointed out they have switched to ash and
their systems are running perfectly fine. So, obviously, "everything" is
*NOT* broken.
Only some things are broken and noone knows the extend of that "some". I
do know, however, that in the past 4-5 months I've been running ash as
/bin/sh I've not encountered anything. So based on my personal observation
I'm inclined to say that "some" is a small enough quantity that it is
something we can handle in some future version by filing bugs against those
"some" and correct them in one manner or another.
- --
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
- -------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.0 (C) 1997 Pretty Good Privacy, Inc
iQA/AwUBN5paSnpf7K2LbpnFEQIN1wCdGU4DkJA2wyyQJjgJqouaFQkbewMAoNhK
L5YD5Kp47RYvqfXdYl5LHJOd
=YbDo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: