Re: Postfix as default MTA?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 29 Jun 1999 15:09:52 +0200, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
>Not the best one, but one of them. We're looking for a universal MTA, which
>must, in some circumstances, be able to handle heavy loads. So efficiency
>doesn't hurt.
There is no such thing as a universal editor. OK. There is no such
thing as a universal MTA, MUA, filtering software, variant of angband, Window
manager, HTTP server, IMAP server, POP server, FTP server, etc.
I wish people would get that through their head.
If an admin is running a machine that has loads so heavy that whatever
MTA is chosen cannot handle it and they do not have the technical ability to
change out the MTA, they have no right running that server in the first
place. PERIOD. Especially not one that is based on Debian!
- --
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
- -------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.0 (C) 1997 Pretty Good Privacy, Inc
iQA/AwUBN3jkOHpf7K2LbpnFEQIEqgCg+X9KwT/6Sn/ZG6eGcqlwbKaIirIAoODf
SnmJKZJkjYhfEYiho1CcHCpR
=nocg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: