Re: Postfix as default MTA?
On Mon, Jun 28, 1999 at 12:02:56PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> >require forking a large process so that it can in turn exec a small
> >one.
>
> Oh god, right there, no. 1000% *NO*. I really disliked qmail's
> segmented architecture.
That seems to be the problem.
> >As for heavy loads, as someone else pointed out, postfix delivers all
> >the freebsd mailing lists, plus some ietf or internic stuff---I
> >honestly forget.
>
> Right, but do we have that for all MTAs so we can compare? See what I'm
> getting at. People are making comparisons based on incomplete data.
Ok - Switch to sendmail ... mostly used MTA.
The technical best product is NOT the most used one.
BTW: It was only a prove of the reliability and robustness of postfix.
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff flo@rfc822.org +49-5241-470566
Good, Fast, Cheap: Pick any two (you can't have all three). (RFC 1925)
Reply to: