Re: Bug#39823: tetex-bin: Texinfo tools should have their own package =(
[please trip the CC: if appropriate]
On Mon, Jun 21, 1999 at 02:46:35PM +0200, Christoph Martin wrote:
> Josip Rodin writes:
> > On Sun, Jun 20, 1999 at 05:48:31PM -0300, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
> > > Look:
> > > "Need to get 13.9Mb of archives. After unpacking 34.8Mb will be used."
> > >
> > > I don't use TeX. I won't use TeX. I just need to use the texinfo
> > > tools... =(
> >
> > [ BTW I thought I submitted a bug like this before... odd. ]
> >
> > Anyway, I also think texinfo stuff should be removed from tetex-bin
> > package.
> >
> > I'm texinfo source package maintainer, but I don't know which sources
> > are better - GNU texinfo ones or those from teTeX? If the former, I'll
> > include a 'texinfo' binary package from texinfo source. If it is the
> > latter case, then tetex maintainer has to split it out himself.
>
> So, someone should find out, which one is better.
I'm crossposting this now to the Texinfo pre-release mailing list,
people there should be able to tell us whether 'their' texinfo
tools are 'better' than those from teTeX.
Versions of programs in question are, I believe, texinfo 3.12i
and teTeX 0.9.990601. Both of those may be upgraded if there
is need, of course.
--
enJoy -*/\*- http://jagor.srce.hr/~jrodin/
Reply to: