Re: inofficially maintained package collection? - SPICE COPYRIGHT issues
On Fri, Jun 18, 1999 at 05:44:57PM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 1999 at 12:37:37AM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
> > On debian-devel, Joop Stakenborg <email@example.com> wrote:
> > > Believe me, spice has no license. Redhat has been packaging spice
> > > for some time now. Don't understand how they did it.
> > I do not understand how other distributions can ship pine.
> They don't pay attention to the license. Simple as that.
Don't know if I remember correctly or not, but doesn't the license say
"without permission" ? -- which means either A) you are right, or
B) they asked and got permission to distribute modified binaries.