Re: 2.2.x bug...
Christian Meder <email@example.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 02, 1999 at 08:37:46AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > The SPARC slink release is 2.2.1, so it is affected.
> That's not completely correct. The Sparc slink release has got 2.0.35
> _and_ 2.2.1. 2.2.1 was mostly added as an alternative kernel and to
> allow installation on UltraSparcs (which weren't officially supported
> in Sparc slink; they just happen to work pretty well with slink and
> Steve Dunham and Eric Delaunay put in some extra last minute work to
> add support for Ultrasparcs to the Sparc slink boot floppies).
I don't know on what basis you say Sun4u is not a first-tier supported
platform. There certainly is nothing I've ever read on debian-sparc
or the boot-floppies list, or read on the web pages, to suggest that.
It is however true that Sun4u is in a wierd spot since it required
linux 2.2, which itself isn't officially support.
However, I do think we are planning on another round of boot-floppies,
which of course would include the fixed 2.2.x kernels for Debian
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>