Re: Bugs in bash (was: Release-critical Bugreport)
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: Bugs in bash (was: Release-critical Bugreport)
- From: James Mastros <email@example.com>
- Date: Sat, 29 May 1999 20:44:50 -0400
- Message-id: <19990529204450.B466@jenner>
- Mail-followup-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- In-reply-to: <19990529135212.A19818@molehole>; from Steve Greenland on Sat, May 29, 1999 at 01:52:12PM -0500
- References: <19990528001503.A9598@master.debian.org> <19990529084332.B1606@portaloo.> <19990529120021.A19542@molehole> <19990529182254.A1584@portaloo.> <19990529135212.A19818@molehole>
On Sat, May 29, 1999 at 01:52:12PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> As far as I know, no one has replaced /bin/sh with something besides
> bash (ash, for example) *and* reported back sufficiently positive
> results to allow us to change the default /bin/sh to something smaller
> than bash. Given that bash must be present on the system, the only clear
> incentive to change /bin/sh to something smaller is start up time, which
> is non-trivial during the boot process.o
I just did exactly that (/bin/sh -> ash), and found errors in two files in
/etc/init.d, both using [ foo == foo ]. One was dhis (which I filed a
bugreport against), and the other was a local modification to network.
There was a slight, but noticable, decrease in startup time.
Just a FYI.
-=- James Mastros
First they came for the fourth amendment, but I said nothing because I
wasn't a drug dealer. Then they came for the sixth amendment, but I kept
quiet because I wasn't guilty. Finally they came for the first amendment,
and by then it was too late to say anything at all."
-=- Nancy Lebowitz
cat /dev/urandom|james --insane=yes > http://www.rtweb.net/theorb/
ICQ: 1293899 AIM: theorbtwo YPager: theorbtwo