Re: i386 is a port, too (was: Re: choices for autobuilder, ...

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: i386 is a port, too (was: Re: choices for autobuilder, ...
From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
Date: 28 May 1999 23:09:00 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] oa4skwwp0z.fsf@arroz.fake>
In-reply-to: Marcus Brinkmann's message of "Sat, 29 May 1999 02:33:28 +0200"
References: <[🔎] 19990527225201.A1333@flora.ruhr-uni-bochum.de> <[🔎] 19990528001859.C609@flora.ruhr-uni-bochum.de> <[🔎] oawvxswvdn.fsf@arroz.fake> <[🔎] 19990529023328.D273@flora.ruhr-uni-bochum.de>

Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> writes:

> It seems more people are needed to build i386 ports of packages.

Or fix wanna-build somehow and someone could run an i386 buildd.

--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>

Reply to:

References:
- choices for autobuilder, and how to sign the changes files then
  - From: Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
- Re: choices for autobuilder, and how to sign the changes files then
  - From: Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
- Re: choices for autobuilder, and how to sign the changes files then
  - From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
- i386 is a port, too (was: Re: choices for autobuilder, ...
  - From: Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>

Prev by Date: Re: i386 is a port, too (was: Re: choices for autobuilder, ...
Next by Date: intent to package metrics
Previous by thread: Re: i386 is a port, too (was: Re: choices for autobuilder, ...
Next by thread: Re: i386 is a port, too (was: Re: choices for autobuilder, ...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread