Re: request to kill nag messages
On Sun, May 23, 1999 at 01:00:19AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"John" == John Goerzen <jgoerzen@alexanderwohl.complete.org> writes:
>
> John> I mean, fix bugs. Then they can be closed. I am aware that
> John> not all bugs have easy solutions, but just because the solution
> John> isn't easy doesn't mean that it is any less important to fix
> John> it.
>
> And unwanted, and unnecesary, periodic zero content nags help
> this process how? Do they help me getting my tough bugs resolved?
> What purpose are they serving, then? Why should they not be treated
> as any other spam?
What does that treatment involve exactly?
Personally I can't see what the fuss is; I'd just delete it if
I didn't like it.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB (ex-VK3TYD).
CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome.
Reply to: