Re: Bug#33262: xlib6g now depends on xfree86-common (?)
- To: Branden Robinson <branden@ecn.purdue.edu>, 33262-done@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: Pierre Mai <pmai@acm.org>, submit@bugs.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#33262: xlib6g now depends on xfree86-common (?)
- From: Peter Van Eynde <pvaneynd@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 15:03:30 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 19990517150330.B3705@mail.inthan.be>
- Mail-followup-to: Branden Robinson <branden@ecn.purdue.edu>, 33262-done@bugs.debian.org, Pierre Mai <pmai@acm.org>, submit@bugs.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <19990211204906.C16305@ecn.purdue.edu>; from Branden Robinson on Thu, Feb 11, 1999 at 08:49:06PM -0500
- References: <19990209133555.C9278@ecn.purdue.edu> <Pine.LNX.3.96.990210110630.2698A-100000@cantor.unex.es> <19990210120921.A12696@ecn.purdue.edu> <19990210234631.A14022@ecn.purdue.edu> <87ogn0ee4s.fsf@orion.dent.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de> <19990211204906.C16305@ecn.purdue.edu>
On Thu, Feb 11, 1999 at 08:49:06PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Package: cmucl-clx
> Version: 2.4.9
>
> On Fri, Feb 12, 1999 at 12:04:19AM +0100, Pierre Mai wrote:
> > This has in fact already happened some time ago, as can be witnessed
> > by CLX, which is an implementation of the X protocol for and in Common
> > Lisp, and has been the de-facto standard for Common Lisp X programs
> > for quite some time (see X11 contrib tapes). And indeed it has
> > already been packaged for Debian, as part of Peter Van Eynde's CMU CL
> > packages (cmucl-clx).
>
> Huh, I'll be damned. I knew a Common LISP equivalent of Xlib existed, but
> I thought it was long dead and not packaged for Debian. I shouldn't
> underestimate my own distribution like that. :)
>
> Can I ask that cmucl-clx *please* depend on xfree86-common for frozen and
> unstable?
Done in 2.4.13.
Groetjes, Peter
--
It's logic Jim, but not as we know it. | pvaneynd@debian.org for pleasure,
"God, root, what is difference?",Pitr | pvaneynd@inthan.be for more pleasure!
Reply to: