[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#37345: PROPOSAL] Adopt the FHS in place of FSSTND

On Sat, May 08, 1999 at 11:27:49PM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Sun, May 09, 1999 at 02:10:27AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > ========
> > 
> > (1) That section 3.1 of the policy be rewritten replacing every
> >     reference to "FSSTND" by the equivalent reference to "FHS".
> > 
> > (2) That a period of consultation on -devel and/or -policy during the
> >     course of the implementation of this change will determine which,
> >     if any, exceptions to the FHS are required.  This will form a new
> >     section 3.1.3 of policy, whose exact wording obviously cannot be
> >     proposed at this stage.
> YES, PLEASE!  By all means I second this.  Even if all packages cannot
> move to FHS right away we need to do our best to become compatible with
> the FHS.  This will be required for LSB compliance anyway, so we might as
> well get going on it.

second seconded.

Too bad we load QA with another burden by this ;P. Oh well, everyone who
doesn't comply just gets a 'normal' bug...

..Aaron Van Couwenberghe... ..vanco@sonic.net.. ..aaronv@debian.org....
	Berlin:			http://www.berlin-consortium.org
	Debian GNU/Linux:	http://www.debian.org

"...Nothing astonishes men so much as common sense and plain dealing..."
	-- Ralph Waldo Emerson

Reply to: