Re: Bug#37345: PROPOSAL] Adopt the FHS in place of FSSTND
On Sun, May 09, 1999 at 09:40:01AM -0700, Aaron Van Couwenberghe wrote:
> On Sat, May 08, 1999 at 11:27:49PM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote:
> > On Sun, May 09, 1999 at 02:10:27AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > PROPOSAL
> > > ========
> > >
> > > (1) That section 3.1 of the policy be rewritten replacing every
> > > reference to "FSSTND" by the equivalent reference to "FHS".
> > >
> > > (2) That a period of consultation on -devel and/or -policy during the
> > > course of the implementation of this change will determine which,
> > > if any, exceptions to the FHS are required. This will form a new
> > > section 3.1.3 of policy, whose exact wording obviously cannot be
> > > proposed at this stage.
> > YES, PLEASE! By all means I second this. Even if all packages cannot
> > move to FHS right away we need to do our best to become compatible with
> > the FHS. This will be required for LSB compliance anyway, so we might as
> > well get going on it.
> second seconded.
ACK! I pologize! This was meant for -policy.
..Aaron Van Couwenberghe... ..email@example.com.. ..firstname.lastname@example.org....
Debian GNU/Linux: http://www.debian.org
"...Nothing astonishes men so much as common sense and plain dealing..."
-- Ralph Waldo Emerson