[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: intent to package gcpegg

In article <199905020421.WAA05954@chunks.gag.com> you wrote:

> Since the sources include an explicit copyright assertion but no explicit
> distribution license

The upstream maintainers indicate in email that the GPL is their choice, which 
is wonderful news.  Now that this is resolved, I'll upload a package to main


Reply to: