Re: Unconditional prompting from dotfile packages
- To: Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
- Cc: Ben Gertzfield <che@debian.org>, dld@coyote.com.au, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, dotfile-bash@packages.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Unconditional prompting from dotfile packages
- From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1999 19:18:48 +1000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 19990422191848.K3025@taz.net.au>
- Mail-followup-to: Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>, Ben Gertzfield <che@debian.org>, dld@coyote.com.au, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, dotfile-bash@packages.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 19990422111127.B27712@cibalia.gkvk.hr>; from Josip Rodin on Thu, Apr 22, 1999 at 11:11:27AM +0200
- References: <[🔎] m10a7fk-000HaGC@otc.coyote.com.au> <[🔎] yttso9te6yn.fsf@gilgamesh.cse.ucsc.edu> <[🔎] 19990422111127.B27712@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
On Thu, Apr 22, 1999 at 11:11:27AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> What do you actually mean by unconditionally prompting - the
> message for bytecompilation? What do you propose, to automatically
> bytecompile?
is there any good reason not to do that? or at least queue the job for
execution when dpkg has exited (similar to what menu does).
craig
--
craig sanders
Reply to: