Re: gcj & libgcj
David Welton wrote:
> This looks really neat, even if it is not by any means a complete
> implementation. It's a front end for ecgs enabling it to compile Java
> to native code.
> I'll work on packaging it in a few weeks, if I have time, and if no
> one else has claimed it. Gcj itself is supposed to be part of ecgs -
> is that indeed the case with our ecgs (I don't currently have access
> to an unstable system) ?
No. GCJ is a part of the unstable series of egcs, and has never been in
a release. I don't believe it's possible to package it without packaging
unstable gcc with it, and g++ and libstdc++ if you want C++
compatibilty. You might want to check it out with the egcs maintainters
<firstname.lastname@example.org> first, as it is stepping into their area, and
they might want to handle it another way or give you advice on how to
David Starner - OSU student - email@example.com
If you want a real optimist, look up Ray Bradbury. Guy's nuts.
He actually likes people. -David Brin