[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Intent to package xmemos

On Tue, Mar 30, 1999 at 04:03:20PM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> No. The current version has had a _clarification_ added, but is
> still very much GPLed (without additional clauses).  See the
> Debian package or http://www.lyx.org/license.html
> In any case, there's a bug reported againsr xwatch but none
> against lyx.  See my point?
Then there should be a bug against lyx...  based on what I know.

> BTW, I'm happy to seek a license change, I just object to BTS
> harassment and declaration like `XWatch should not be in there'.
I can understand some of that sentiment, but please don't look on the BTS
as harassment.  It's supposed to be used for passing situations (like this)
to maintainers of packages...

Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also.
* http://benham.net/index.html        <gecko@benham.net>           <><  *
* -------------------- * -----------------------------------------------*
* Debian Developer, Debian Project Secretary, Debian Webmaster          *
* <gecko@debian.org> <secretary@debian.org> <webmaster@debian.org>      *
* <lintian-maint@debian.org>                                            *

Reply to: