[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Intent to package xmemos

On Tue, Mar 30, 1999 at 04:03:20PM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> BTW, I'm happy to seek a license change, I just object to BTS
> harassment and declaration like `XWatch should not be in there'.

Please, try to not get upset. We will treat all packages on an equal base. A
bug in the BTS is not much more then a few bytes on some server somewhere.

I think the reason no bug report was filed against lyx is that people
are/were in faith believe that the situation with Lyx was resolved by a
license change. It seems this is wrong.

We need to discuss this. For now, please ignore any bug reports etc and make
sure we reach a consensus on this list how to treat those packages.


`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org   finger brinkmd@ 
Marcus Brinkmann              GNU    http://www.gnu.org     master.debian.org
Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de                        for public  PGP Key
http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/Marcus.Brinkmann/       PGP Key ID 36E7CD09

Reply to: