Re: RFC: Inclusion of "An Anarchist FAQ"
On Thu, Mar 18, 1999 at 01:16:03AM -0500, Ed Boraas wrote:
> Those people who have objected to the inclusion of the Anarchist FAQ in
> debian have raised some good points; at what point does a document merit
> inclusion in debian? Are there strict criteria? Should it be of
> specifically OS-related content, or do documents of political opinion fit
> into the scheme? Originally, I thought that the anarchist FAQ, as a GPL'd
> and very popular document, would be valuable in the distro. In fact, I'd
> received requests from some people about deb-packaged versions of the FAQ.
This has been stressed a lot.
As long as we keep the bible in debian (priority: optional, section:
doc) we must permit also other non-technical docs to live in debian.
It would be ok for me to draw the line on the SW/HW technical matter,
but then the bible must go away as well.
my 0.2 euros
| firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org
| 6F7267F5 fingerprint 57 16 C4 ED C9 86 40 7B 1A 69 A1 66 EC FB D2 5E
| email@example.com gsm: +358 40 707 2468