[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: freedom-subtracted.debian.org (was: Re: KDE)



On Thu, Mar 11, 1999 at 11:38:15PM -0500, Steve Willer wrote:
> > > It's relatively painless to implement and doesn't add any significant
> > > inconvenience to the user. It also makes the point. Doesn't it?
> > 
> > "vrms"?
> 
> Virtual RMS. It's a .deb, part of the standard dist (at least on potato). 
> It tells you about all of the packages that are non-free. It runs on the
> command line, but the package also installs it as a monthly cron job by
> default. 

Sounds obnoxious and otherwise generally annoying most of the time. 
Appropriately named I think.  ;>


> I've been thinking about this, and it definitely has some appeal. It
> doesn't limit the user's choices, and it might actually educate them. You
> could even take it a step further and require non-free .debs to have a
> field in them that describes *why* the package is "non-free" (patent
> restrictions, license doesn't allow modified distribution of modified
> binaries, etc.). Then vrms could list this information along with the
> package.

This has been discussed and shot down.  If we start telling other people
why things aren't free software we open ourselves to lausuits and other
nastiness.

-- 
Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org>            Debian GNU/Linux developer
PGP: E8D68481E3A8BB77 8EE22996C9445FBE            The Source Comes First!
To boldly go where no bunch of geeks have gone before :)   --Joel Klecker

Attachment: pgp09xbd8cLRR.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: