[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: How does anyone keep up with this list?




Sven LUTHER <luther@maxime.u-strasbg.fr> wrote:

> maybe someone knowledgeable with mutt and procmail, or whatever stuff
> is mostly used could make a `debian-lists-reader-help` packages that
> contains the apropiate config files needed to easily read the
> different debian mailing lists, as well as a small documentation or
> howto on how to best use them so that the less promail/mutt/... savvy
> users can read their mail easily.

YES!  PLEASE!

> I would do it, but my knowledge on debian lists and procmail stuff is
> a bit limited ...

That's okay.  If you put something rough together, then others can
help refine it.  


Here's how I'm doing it at present:


I read all my mail with emacs rmail.  I sort messages by subject
(primary) and date (secondary) (that is, C-c C-s C-d C-c C-s C-s).  I
then display a summary of only the unseen messages (C-u l unseen).

Advantages: 
The sorting threads things approximately (not where system clocks or
time zones are incorrect).  I can delete a message with a single
keystroke.  Looking at the summary, I can tell how many messages are
in the same thread, and delete them rapidly.

Disadvantages: 
List traffic is not separated from personal email.  The system keeps
no memory of which threads do not interest me, so the next time I read
the mail I still have to check each subject manually.  I can minimize
this overhead by waiting a couple of days before reading mail again.  

Notes: 
I would like a single command for "delete current message and all
following messages with the same subject".  A friend even drafted one
for me.  Unfortunately, it does not work, and I do not know enough
elisp to debug it.

I would like to improve my setup.  Scoring would be nice.  I have
tried GNUS a couple of times, but was not able to get it working.  A
pre-tuned set of scripts and config files, with some discussion, would
be a big help.

                          - Jim Van Zandt


Reply to: