(from -private) On Thu, Mar 04, 1999 at 12:28:14AM -0300, Lalo Martins wrote: > My concern isn't as much about "bleeding edge" as it is about > the fact that many of the developers think the release system is > broken. I'd not say `broken'. We make pretty good releases, and we do them in reasonable amounts of time. People are *still* using bo and are quite happy with it, hamm has needed a few security updates and that's it, and slink's about ready to be released with a number of major packaging (as opposed to upstream) changes [0]. Sure, I think we could do better. I even have some ideas about how we could do better, but I also think the way everything currently works is pretty darn good, and I don't think it's worth getting stressed about it and saying "Oh my god, we'd better freeze potato tomorrow if we ever want to release it" and whatever else. Cheers, aj [0] X has been, essentially, completely repackaged; Apt has been added, and the binary distribution is about three times as large as RedHat's now. We've doubled the number of architectures we support. -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. PGP encrypted mail preferred. ``Like the ski resort of girls looking for husbands and husbands looking for girls, the situation is not as symmetrical as it might seem.''
Attachment:
pgp0sQTS2glhc.pgp
Description: PGP signature