[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Kernel 2.2.1



		did you check linux/Documentation/Changes and make sure
that you have the required version  of al the software ?

Pedro Guerreiro <pguerreiro@bigfoot.com> writes:

> On Sun, Feb 21, 1999 at 08:13:20PM -0700, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, Feb 21, 1999 at 02:26:59PM -0800, Alex Romosan wrote:
> > > i am running 2.2.1 on two machines and i noticed that sometimes
> > > apt-get update completely locks up the machines. i can't kill the
> > > offending process, i can't even reboot. could this have anything to do
> > > with this change in behaviour? (i never saw this with 2.0.x kernels.
> > > fortunately it doesn't happen all the time, but nevertheless when it
> > > happens it is very unnerving).
> 
> I am running 2.2.1 with Alan Cox's patch 5 (ac5) on a half hamm half slink
> system (haven't had the time to update all, just the important and the stuff
> that I use frequently), and never had any problems with apt-0.30. BTW, I
> never tried to use apt-get update by itself, I've always gone through dselect
> (old habits die hard :-) ).
> 
> > I'm running 2.2.1 on several systems (with potato) and haven't
> > had any lockups.  I have only noticed one thing so far...
> > lsof is compiled for 2.0.35 and just complaines if you try
> > to run it. 
> 
> I've got lsof_4.28-3, compiled to 2.0.34, and works just fine as far as I
> can tell. At least it didn't complained when I run it :-)
> 
> bye.
> --
> Pedro Guerreiro      (pguerreiro@bigfoot.com)
>             o       _      _          _
>    _o      /\_    _ \\o   (_)\__/o   (_)
>  _< \_    _>(_)  (_)/<_     \_| \    _|/'\/
> (_)>(_)  (_)         (_)    (_)     (_)' _\o_
> ----------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 

-- 
John Lapeyre <lapeyre@physics.arizona.edu>
Tucson,AZ     http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre


Reply to: