Re: Neat gtk/gdk-imlib pain
On 1 Feb 1999, Gordon Matzigkeit wrote:
> JP> It's just a variation on the bumping the soname idea.
> I'm now convinced that the problem can't be solved without changing
> ld.so. I have some ideas about how this could be done... I'll do some
> experimentation, then chat with the glibc folks (who tend to be pretty
> anal about elegance, so if we come up with a solution that works,
> it'll be as elegant as it can be).
I hate to say it, but wouldn't a ld.so solution put us right back to the
'rpath is bad' thread except this time we get to say 'Our nifty new ULTRA
SMART ld.so breaks with rpath because it still follows POSIX!'