Re: What's needed for kernel 2.2
Remco van de Meent <email@example.com> wrote:
> Because I, like every other user should do, read the documentation, and thus
> read you need util-linux 2.9g. And if it works for you with lower versions,
> does it always work? Yes, maybe, no, maybe not. I don't even want to take
> the risk of 'yes it works most of the time, but sometimes it doesnt', with
It's probably worth noting in the package description that this copy
is not hacked.
2.9h has a bunch of new code and may or may not be stable (it will take
weeks to find out).