Re: LSH (GPL'd SSH)
J.H.M. Dassen wrote:
>> Another freeness issue (albeit a relatively minor one) is that currently
>> lsh requires scsh (which is non-free) for the generation of include files
>> (they are pregenerated in the tarball; the scsh scripts are needed only
>> for development). It would be nice if someone could modify them to work
>> with a free Scheme implementation (say Guile), or reimplement them in
>> another free scripting language (perl, python etc.).
Ben Collins <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Good point, I saw that, but forgot about it. The TODO/TASKLIST mentions
> and idea about using Guile, so that would seem the best way to go.
If the scripts are generated using a more common scripting language (like
perl), then you're more likely to have developers work on it.