Re: Debian logo & its license
>>>>> On Sun, 24 Jan 1999 00:52:12 +0100, Wichert Akkerman <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
Wichert> [1 <text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)>] For the Nth
Wichert> time our logo license has expired. It might be a good idea
Wichert> to finally finalize the license instead of just extending
Wichert> its lifetime every couple of months.
Wichert> There has also been mention of people wanting a different
Wichert> logo. I think we should stick to our current logo for
Wichert> several reasons though:
Wichert> * it is a good logo: it's easily recognizable, simple to
Wichert> draw, scales good and looks good in both black&white and
Wichert> in colour.
Wichert> * choosing a new logo will take a long time: we would have
Wichert> to get submissions, vote on them all over again, etc.
Wichert> * I actually like the thing :)
Wichert> I propose that we vote on accepting both the logo and the
Wichert> current license.
Since this seems to be a formal proposal. I second. I'd like to see
an end to the issue once and for all.
I see two different votes here:
1) A formal logo license that Debian will use.
2) What we do about the logo (with options a) keep current, b) keep
current for some amount of time, c) get new one in some manner).
@James LewisMoss <email@example.com> | Blessed Be!
@ http://www.ioa.com/~dres | Linux is kewl!
@"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach