Re: No intend to package vbox

[Roland Rosenfeld <roland@spinnaker.rhein.de>]

Paul Slootman <paul@wau.mis.ah.nl> wrote:

> I'm planning to split up isdnutils sometime into separate parts;
> there are many sites where for example vbox isn't used at all, so
> having it installed isn't useful.

Sound reasonable.

> isdnvbox         vbox

Hmmm, maybe this should be split into two packages, the vboxgetty and
vboxd on the one hand and the vbox client on the other hand. What I
want to say is, that there should be some chance to install only the
vbox client on a machine without the need to install a complete isdn
subsystem.

Tschoeeee

        Roland

-- 
 * roland@spinnaker.rhein.de * http://www.rhein.de/~roland/ *
 PGP: 1024/DD08DD6D   2D E7 CC DE D5 8D 78 BE  3C A0 A4 F1 4B 09 CE AF