Re: make mutt the `standard' mail reader
On Sun, Jan 17, 1999 at 12:55:10AM -0700, Bruce Sass wrote:
> Maybe this is the reason why:
> (from a quick peek at the BTS ~30 min ago)
>
> number of bugs in ... elm-me+ pine mutt
> ------- ---- ----
> outstanding normal 0 0 7
> wishlist 0 1 6
> forwarded normal 0 2 9
> wishlist 0 2 7
> resolved normal 2 0 12
> wishlist 0 0 3
> --- --- ---
> 2 5 44
>
> Which one(s) would you look at if you were going to stake your
> reputation, or a portion thereof, by recommending a `standard'
> piece of software?
I would go for mutt, because it means people are actually using it and
finding the bugs. (AND the bugs are going to be fixed, 12+3=15 resolved
bugs in the last 28 days).
Marcus
--
"Rhubarb is no Egyptian god." Debian GNU/Linux finger brinkmd@
Marcus Brinkmann http://www.debian.org master.debian.org
Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de for public PGP Key
http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/Marcus.Brinkmann/ PGP Key ID 36E7CD09
Reply to: